Close Menu
  • Home
  • Naija-News
  • Sports
  • 9ja-Lyrics
  • Entertainment
  • Get In Touch
What's Hot

Govs’ reluctance to sign death warrants attributed to justice system complexity

July 16, 2025

Presidency plans special FEC to honour Buhari

July 16, 2025

Transfer: I want to leave Atalanta – Lookman decides on next club

July 16, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Naija News Live
  • Home
  • Naija-News
  • Sports
  • 9ja-Lyrics
  • Entertainment
  • Get In Touch
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Naija News Live
Home » Fubara: Tinubu’s emergency rule in Rivers faces legal test as court sets May 26 for hearing
Naija-News

Fubara: Tinubu’s emergency rule in Rivers faces legal test as court sets May 26 for hearing

9jaliveBy 9jaliveMay 12, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
fubara:-tinubu’s-emergency-rule-in-rivers-faces-legal-test-as-court-sets-may-26-for-hearing
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Federal High Court in Port Harcourt has adjourned until May 26, 2025, the constitutional suit filed by Dr. Farah Dagogo, a former federal lawmaker and 2023 Rivers State governorship aspirant, challenging President Bola Tinubu’s suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Deputy Governor Professor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

President Tinubu, on March 18, 2025, declared a state of emergency in Rivers State due to the prolonged political crisis in the state, which he said posed a threat to national assets in the oil sector.

He subsequently suspended the state’s democratically elected leadership and appointed retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas as the state’s Sole Administrator.

In reaction, Dr. Dagogo filed Suit No: FHC/PH/CS/50/2025 on April 9, 2025, contending that the President’s actions were unconstitutional and exceeded his legal authority.

During Monday’s hearing, the plaintiff’s counsel, Cosmas Enweluzo, SAN, informed the court that all defendants had been properly served and that they were ready to proceed.

The defendants listed in the suit include President Tinubu, Senate President Senator Godswill Akpabio, the Nigerian Senate, Speaker of the House of Representatives Hon. Tajudeen Abbas, and Ibas.

Of the defendants, only the fifth, Vice Admiral Ibas, was represented in court through his counsel, Kehinde Ogunwumiju, SAN, who requested more time to respond to the originating summons.

After hearing from both sides, Justice Adamu Turaki Mohammed granted the extension but emphasized that the case would proceed on the next adjourned date regardless of any further delays.

Speaking to journalists after the session, Enweluzo maintained that President Tinubu’s actions were unconstitutional.

Enweluzo said, “The President cannot act as a ‘Tin god.’ He does not have the constitutional authority to suspend elected representatives or govern over four million Rivers people and those doing business in Rivers State by fiat.

“It is a constitutional aberration and must not be allowed.”

He added, “The insecurity narrative is unfounded. In Benue, Plateau, and Borno States, serious security challenges persist, people are being killed, and some local governments remain under Boko Haram control.

“Yet no state of emergency was declared there. Rivers State has remained relatively peaceful.”

While commending Dagogo for taking legal action against the president’s decision, Enweluzo said, “We are grateful for principled leaders like Dr. Farah Dagogo who are willing to defend the Nigerian Constitution.

“Citizens have a right to be governed by officials they have elected and represented by legislators of their constituencies in Degema, Bonny, and others.”

Providing insight into the reason for the adjournment, Enweluzo explained that counsel for the fifth defendant informed the court that their team was at the court registry filing documents in response to the originating summons.

He noted that the fifth defendant’s counsel requested an adjournment to finalize the filing process, and in the interest of fairness, they did not object.

Enweluzo further stated that although all other defendants had been properly served, none had filed a memorandum of appearance, conditional appearance, or any form of legal response to the suit.

Meanwhile, counsel to the fifth defendant, Kehinde Ogunwumiju, SAN, declined to comment on the matter.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
9jalive

Related Posts

Govs’ reluctance to sign death warrants attributed to justice system complexity

July 16, 2025

Presidency plans special FEC to honour Buhari

July 16, 2025

Transfer: I want to leave Atalanta – Lookman decides on next club

July 16, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Govs’ reluctance to sign death warrants attributed to justice system complexity
  • Presidency plans special FEC to honour Buhari
  • Transfer: I want to leave Atalanta – Lookman decides on next club
  • Adeleke begging to join APC  —  Omisore
  • Delta Central APC reaffirms commitment to Oborevwori as sole candidate for 2027
Our Picks
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss
Naija-News

Govs’ reluctance to sign death warrants attributed to justice system complexity

By 9jaliveJuly 16, 20250

The Niger State Commissioner for Justice and Attorney General, Alhaji Nasiru Mu’azu, has attributed the…

Presidency plans special FEC to honour Buhari

July 16, 2025

Transfer: I want to leave Atalanta – Lookman decides on next club

July 16, 2025

Adeleke begging to join APC  —  Omisore

July 16, 2025
About 9jaLive

Updating you with Latest News, Entertainment gist Straight outta Naira
We're accepting new partnerships right now.

Email Us: info@9jalive.com.ng
Contact: +234-8171894811

Our Picks
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Naija-News
  • Sports
  • 9ja-Lyrics
  • Entertainment
  • Get In Touch
© 2025 9jaLive Designed by TrimlinesTech.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.